<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:cf="http://www.microsoft.com/schemas/rss/core/2005" xmlns:g="http://base.google.com/ns/1.0" xmlns:rssdatehelper="urn:rssdatehelper" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>EAD Solicitors - News Feed</title><cf:treatAs>list</cf:treatAs><link>http://www.eadsolicitors.co.uk/</link><description>The latest news direct from EAD Solicitors.</description><language>en-GB</language><ttl>720</ttl><item><title>Court issues first WEEE prosecution</title><link>http://www.eadsolicitors.co.uk/news/court-issues-first-weee-prosecution.aspx</link><description>
A Birmingham based hairdresser has become the first individual
to be prosecuted under recently enforced Waste Electrical and
Electronic Equipment (WEEE) regulations.

Earlier this year, Aston and Fincher Ltd pleaded guilty to 31
charges relating to failure to comply with packaging waste
regulations and failing to register as a producer of electrical and
electronic waste.

According to the Environment Agency (EA), the company avoided
paying £445 plus unknown costs of financing the recovery and
recycling of equipment for which they would have been responsible
in 2008.

Aston and Fincher was fined £650 for each offence - totalling
£20,150. It was also ordered to pay compensation of £7,135 to the
EA for loss of registration fees, costs of £3,605.11 and a victim
surcharge of £15.

"This is the first prosecution of a business for offences under
both the Packaging regulations and the similar producer
responsibility legislation for electrical equipment," commen</description><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eadsolicitors.co.uk/news/court-issues-first-weee-prosecution.aspx</guid><pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 08:47:48 GMT</pubDate><content:encoded><![CDATA[ ]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Couples’ secrecy risking probate issues</title><link>http://www.eadsolicitors.co.uk/news/couples-secrecy-risking-probate-issues.aspx</link><description>
British couples risk problems in later life by failing to
discuss their estates and Wills while keeping personal finance
secrets, new research has revealed.

A study by Prudential found that 22% of couples said they have
never discussed estate planning together while 12% of women and 11%
of men said they know nothing about probate plans and were not
interested.

In addition, 32% of people over the age of 40 but not yet
retired do not know the details of their partner's retirement
savings or plans.

"It is incredible that so many people do not know the details of
their partner's retirement savings," commented Prudential
spokesperson Amy Brown.

"Firstly, couples should strive to have open conversations with
one another but they also should aim to be constructive and use
these conversations to begin laying the foundations for their
retirement and estate planning.

"The longer planning goes unresolved the harder it is for
couples later in life."</description><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eadsolicitors.co.uk/news/couples-secrecy-risking-probate-issues.aspx</guid><pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 08:46:03 GMT</pubDate><content:encoded><![CDATA[ ]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>10million Brits owed tax rebate</title><link>http://www.eadsolicitors.co.uk/news/10million-brits-owed-tax-rebate.aspx</link><description>
A string of errors at HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) means more
than 10million people could be in line for a substantial tax
rebate.

Earlier this month, HMRC admitted that 4.3million people are set
to receive a rebate due to tax overpayments in the past two years.
But new evidence regarding historic errors now means an additional
5.8million could be eligible for payments.

Almost £1.8billion in overpaid tax has been given to HMRC in the
past two years, while approximately £3billion was mistakenly given
in the two years prior to 2008.

On September 4th, the Treasury said nearly 6million
people in the UK are to be told they have paid the wrong amount of
tax in the past two years, with some facing bills of up to £5,000.
The further errors identified since then could add a further 7.7
million people to the total number affected.

Those set for rebates because they have paid too much tax in the
past two years are expected to receive an average of </description><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eadsolicitors.co.uk/news/10million-brits-owed-tax-rebate.aspx</guid><pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 08:45:27 GMT</pubDate><content:encoded><![CDATA[ ]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>First trader fined under ‘Pedlars’ Act’</title><link>http://www.eadsolicitors.co.uk/news/first-trader-fined-under-‘pedlars-act.aspx</link><description>
Manchester town hall chiefs have won their first prosecution
since bringing in new 'pedlar' legislation to clamp down on rogue
street trading.

The Manchester City Council Act - widely known as the Pedlars'
Act - became law earlier this year following a £100,000 drive by
the council. Under the Act, town hall officers are given greater
powers to seize goods from people suspected of trading
illegally.

Earlier this month, Tapha Lo became the first victim of the law
and was forced to pay £1,100 after he was caught trading in Market
Street, a busy spot in Manchester city centre.

The rules of a pedlars' certificate allow holders to sell
anywhere in the country as long as they move on regularly. But,
under the new act, Manchester council won powers to seize goods
from anyone caught selling from one spot for more than five minutes
and therefore abusing the terms of the certificate.

Magistrates fined Mr Lo £525 for his offence and awarded £606
costs to the co</description><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eadsolicitors.co.uk/news/first-trader-fined-under-‘pedlars-act.aspx</guid><pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 08:43:39 GMT</pubDate><content:encoded><![CDATA[ ]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Flexible working equals improved relations</title><link>http://www.eadsolicitors.co.uk/news/flexible-working-equals-improved-relations.aspx</link><description>
Employers who offer their staff the chance to adapt working
hours are more likely to enjoy a positive working relationship, new
research has found.

According to studies by the Institute of Leadership &amp;amp;
Management (ILM) and Management Today magazine, organisations that
have reacted to the global economic downturn by opting for flexible
working and similar schemes are more likely to succeed thanks to
higher Chief Executive Officer (CEO) trust levels.

Organisations hit hard by the recession have "extremely low"
levels of trust amongst staff while job losses and office closures
are blamed on poor management, ILM found.

Despite the dip in trust, female bosses appear to have emerged
particularly well from the recession, the report states. Confidence
in female CEOs has increased by four points since the 2009 Index,
with women achieving an index score of 66 on a 100-point scale,
compared to 63 for their male counterparts.

In total, more than 5,000 emplo</description><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eadsolicitors.co.uk/news/flexible-working-equals-improved-relations.aspx</guid><pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 15:34:15 GMT</pubDate><content:encoded><![CDATA[ ]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Firm fined after series of serious injuries</title><link>http://www.eadsolicitors.co.uk/news/firm-fined-after-series-of-serious-injuries.aspx</link><description>
A Troon sawmilling firm has been fined a total of £28,000 after
two of its employees were severely injured in separate incidents
just months apart.

In May 2007, 55-year-old John Wilson was working for Adam Wilson
and Sons in Troon, Ayrshire, when he fell through a gap in a raised
walkway, left open after work had been done on a conveyor belt
below. He suffered serious injuries to his arm and permanent loss
of movement in his shoulder as a result of the fall.

Less than three months later, 59-year-old Robert Cumming was
working for the same firm at the same plant when his head was
trapped between the metal parts of a hoist after it was
accidentally switched on. He suffered serious crush injuries to his
head and neck and required emergency surgery and attends ongoing
physiotherapy for his injuries.

Health and Safety Executive (HSE) investigations found that Adam
Wilson and Sons did not have safe systems of work in place for
maintaining the conveyor belt, or th</description><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eadsolicitors.co.uk/news/firm-fined-after-series-of-serious-injuries.aspx</guid><pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 15:31:01 GMT</pubDate><content:encoded><![CDATA[ ]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Business urged to adapt equal pay policies</title><link>http://www.eadsolicitors.co.uk/news/business-urged-to-adapt-equal-pay-policies.aspx</link><description>
The British Chambers of Commerce (BCC) and Equality and Human
Rights Commission (EHRC) have called on small and medium size
businesses to examine their pay systems and ensure they comply with
equal pay laws.

On average, full-time female workers are paid 16.4% per hour
less than men on average, rising to 21.6% in private firms,
according to the EHRC.

To tackle the issue, the Commission and BBC have published a new
guide for employers to solve equality pay issues, which should take
no more than four hours to implement.

"Businesses want to pay people fairly for the job that they do.
This guidance should help smaller businesses analyse any pay gap
and make any changes required by law," said BCC Director General
David Frost.

"Taking action now to make pay systems transparent and fair
should help businesses recruit the best talent to enable the
private sector to drive economic recovery."

Jean Irvine, an EHRC commissioner, added: "Employers need pa</description><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eadsolicitors.co.uk/news/business-urged-to-adapt-equal-pay-policies.aspx</guid><pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 15:28:00 GMT</pubDate><content:encoded><![CDATA[ ]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Teaching Assistant attacked by child wins case through EAD Solicitors</title><link>http://www.eadsolicitors.co.uk/news/teaching-assistant-attacked-by-child-wins-case-through-ead-solicitors.aspx</link><description>
Our client was a teaching assistant at a school in England,
where she taught reception class.&amp;nbsp; A 3 year old child escaped
from the nursery building into the playground, where he then tried
to escape from the playground and ran towards a wall.&amp;nbsp; Our
client put her arm out to stop the child who then grabbed and bit
her arm causing a nasty wound, which consequently left a scar.

The CICA rejected the case initially and at review stage because
they stated that although the child was behaving badly, given the
age of the child, there was no criminal intent.

There had been a previous similar case in Liverpool in November
2009 (Kirwans Solicitors) where the CICA granted compensation to a
3 year old boy who was hit 11 times with a car jack by a child of
the same age - Jay Jones v CICA.

Our client attended for a CICA Appeal Hearing in August 2010 at
Liverpool.&amp;nbsp; She was represented by Ben Handy, Counsel from
Harrington Street Chambers.&amp;nbsp; He had also r</description><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eadsolicitors.co.uk/news/teaching-assistant-attacked-by-child-wins-case-through-ead-solicitors.aspx</guid><pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 10:56:11 GMT</pubDate><content:encoded><![CDATA[ ]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>EAD Solicitors win low speed impact claims for two clients</title><link>http://www.eadsolicitors.co.uk/news/ead-solicitors-win-low-speed-impact-claims-for-two-clients.aspx</link><description>
EAD Solicitors LLP has again settled two Road Traffic Accident
claims for drivers in which the insurers alleged that a low speed
impact caused no injury. Both Defendants did eventually accept
responsibility for the accident, however in the first instance,
both Defendant's lawyers alleged that the impact was not sufficient
to cause an injury and both produced an engineer's report which
appeared to support this. The Defendants lawyers also alleged that
our clients only suffered minor injuries and produced their own
orthopaedic evidence, which EAD Solicitors LLP successfully
countered with our own medical reports.

The significant outcome of EAD's success is that many solicitors
are not prepared to pursue these types of cases because of the cost
implications. EAD Solicitors LLP can and will successfully act on
behalf of Claimants with these types of low speed impact
claims.

The Claimants were 100% successful and the both Defendants
arguments of low speed, no injury was</description><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eadsolicitors.co.uk/news/ead-solicitors-win-low-speed-impact-claims-for-two-clients.aspx</guid><pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 10:38:36 GMT</pubDate><content:encoded><![CDATA[ ]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Several conditions excluded from Equality Act protection</title><link>http://www.eadsolicitors.co.uk/news/several-conditions-excluded-from-equality-act-protection.aspx</link><description>
Further details of the upcoming Equality Act have surfaced
listing a number of physical and mental traits excluded from
employment protections.

Government published Equality Act 2010 (Disability) Regulations
guidelines outline conditions which have been excluded from
disability recognition, including:


&amp;nbsp;Addiction to alcohol, nicotine or any other substance
(unless the addiction was originally the result of administration
of medically prescribed drugs or other medical treatment).

The following conditions: a tendency to set fires, a tendency
to steal, a tendency for physical or sexual abuse of other persons,
exhibitionism, and voyeurism.

Allergic Rhinitis (hay fever) unless it aggravates another
condition.


In addition, tattoos and body piercings are excluded from being
seen as a "severe disfigurement" or have a "substantial adverse
effects" on the ability of the person concerned to carry out normal
day-to-day activities.</description><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eadsolicitors.co.uk/news/several-conditions-excluded-from-equality-act-protection.aspx</guid><pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 10:32:28 GMT</pubDate><content:encoded><![CDATA[ ]]></content:encoded></item></channel></rss>