<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:cf="http://www.microsoft.com/schemas/rss/core/2005" xmlns:g="http://base.google.com/ns/1.0" xmlns:rssdatehelper="urn:rssdatehelper" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>EAD Solicitors - News Feed</title><cf:treatAs>list</cf:treatAs><link>http://www.eadsolicitors.co.uk/</link><description>The latest news direct from EAD Solicitors.</description><language>en-GB</language><ttl>720</ttl><item><title>Liverpool Solicitors Strengthen Union Links With Merger</title><link>http://www.eadsolicitors.co.uk/news/liverpool-solicitors-strengthen-union-links-with-merger.aspx</link><description>
Liverpool law firms EAD Solicitors LLP and city centre practice
John A. Behn Twyford have announced a merger, consolidating EAD
Solicitors' offering as a specialist in legal services to trade
unions. The two firms plan for the merger to take effect from 1
February 2012.

Established in 1902, Behn Twyford specialises in employment law,
litigation and accidents and injuries and has a history of working
for trade unions. It has worked for TGWU (now Unite the Union)
since its inception in 1922 and for USDAW since its inception in
1947, complementing EAD Solicitors' existing union work with Unite
and other trade unions.

&amp;nbsp;EAD Solicitors has a strong reputation for personal injury
and employment litigation and has close links with the trade union
movement across the North and beyond, with an office in
Huddersfield working alongside its Liverpool team.

The merger brings three partners and one solicitor into EAD's
existing staff.

Said Mike Sexton, Managi</description><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eadsolicitors.co.uk/news/liverpool-solicitors-strengthen-union-links-with-merger.aspx</guid><pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 11:02:58 GMT</pubDate><content:encoded><![CDATA[ ]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Former Castleton Woolworths Workers Win Payout  </title><link>http://www.eadsolicitors.co.uk/news/former-castleton-woolworths-workers-win-payout--.aspx</link><description>
Three years after the collapse of retail chain Woolworths,
around 150 former workers at Woolworths' Castleton distribution
centre in Rochdale have won the right to a protective award thanks
to their union Unite.

The Central Employment Tribunal unanimously decided to uphold
the claim that Woolworths failed in its legal duty to consult with
staff adequately before dismissing over 27,000 staff across the UK
in December 2008.

The Tribunal agreed that token consultation on behalf of the
administrators failed to make any real effort to engage with union
representatives.

The judgment may amount to the largest protective award of its
kind in the UK, given the total number of staff involved: if
eligible, they will receive up to 60 days' pay. The overall
compensation figure for those dismissed from the high street store
could add up to as much as £67 million.

The compensation payments will be made by the government's
Redundancy Payments Office, which will be </description><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eadsolicitors.co.uk/news/former-castleton-woolworths-workers-win-payout--.aspx</guid><pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 12:56:05 GMT</pubDate><content:encoded><![CDATA[ ]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Injury Victims V Celebrities</title><link>http://www.eadsolicitors.co.uk/news/injury-victims-v-celebrities.aspx</link><description>
There has been much coverage in the press about the compensation
paid out to celebrities by News International following the
'hacking' scandal. This has clearly been a disgraceful invasion of
privacy and nobody can have much sympathy for Rupert Murdoch's
company for having to make these payments.

But the amount the payments raises another interesting issue.
That is the comparison between compensation paid to victims of
hacking and that paid to victims of accidents. The latter have been
subject to vilification by politicians, the press and insurance
industry who say that we have a 'compensation culture' which needs
to be dismantled.

So let's look at some of figures that have been reported for
victims of hacking. Jude Law got £130k. In an earlier settlement
his ex, Sienna Miller, accepted £100k. These are to compensate the
victims for injury to feelings etc and not for financial
losses.

According to the most recent Guidelines Personal Injury Damages
such awar</description><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eadsolicitors.co.uk/news/injury-victims-v-celebrities.aspx</guid><pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 14:10:57 GMT</pubDate><content:encoded><![CDATA[ ]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Employment law in 2012: What you need to know</title><link>http://www.eadsolicitors.co.uk/news/employment-law-in-2012-what-you-need-to-know.aspx</link><description>
As the New Year celebrations subside, employees and business
owners up and down the country have been told to take heed of a
raft of employment law changes ready for introduction in 2012.

Employers will need to prepare themselves for increased demands
in 2012, but if you're a hard working employee, it's important to
know what increased rights are coming your way over the next 12
months.

Here are the most important changes for 2012:

- From April 2012, parental leave entitlement will increase from
three to four months.

- Effective as of April 9th, Statutory Maternity,
Paternity and Adoption pay will increase to £135.45 per week.

- In addition, Statutory Sick Pay will increase to £85.85 per
week, a rise of £4.25 a week.

- Changes to the Employment Tribunal system will
include:&amp;nbsp;


Maximum deposit orders being increased from £500 to £1,000

Maximum costs orders being increased from £10,000 to
£20,000</description><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eadsolicitors.co.uk/news/employment-law-in-2012-what-you-need-to-know.aspx</guid><pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 09:14:32 GMT</pubDate><content:encoded><![CDATA[ ]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Rush to meet stamp duty holiday</title><link>http://www.eadsolicitors.co.uk/news/rush-to-meet-stamp-duty-holiday.aspx</link><description>
Activity among first time buyers is expected to rocket over the
next month, as prospective homeowners rush to beat the deadline for
the returning stamp duty tax.

According to Wales Online, house sales in the south of Wales
have boomed recently in order to avoid the one per cent duty on
properties between £125,000 and £250,000, which will come back into
force later this year.

"In the next couple of months there will be a surge - because it
is a saving after all - but after March 24 I think there will be a
lull, because first-time buyers will have £1,000-£2,000 extra to
pay," Tony Filice, spokesman for the Royal Institution of Chartered
Surveyors Wales', told Wales Today.

The tax holiday was introduced for first time buyers by former
Chancellor Alistair Darling before the 2010 General Election in
order to prop up the flagging housing market. However, current
Chancellor George Osborne won't be renewing the holiday beyond
March.

The government will inst</description><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eadsolicitors.co.uk/news/rush-to-meet-stamp-duty-holiday.aspx</guid><pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 09:04:36 GMT</pubDate><content:encoded><![CDATA[ ]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>What happens if you die without making a Will?</title><link>http://www.eadsolicitors.co.uk/news/what-happens-if-you-die-without-making-a-will.aspx</link><description>
We are constantly told of the importance of making a Will. But
many are unaware of how their estates will be divided should they
die without one.

The intestacy laws provide for a different distribution
depending on the identity of the people you leave behind. Let's
consider the following situations:

I am married or in a civil partnership with
children

Your spouse will receive all your personal belongings. The first
£250,000 of your estate will also pass to your spouse. The
remainder of the estate will be split into two. One half shall pass
absolutely to your children. The other half will be subject to a
life interest in favour of your spouse but will pass to your
children on his or her death.

I am married or in a civil partnership with no children
but my parents also survive me

In this scenario your spouse will receive your personal
belongings and the first £450,000 of your estate. The remainder of
the estate is div</description><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eadsolicitors.co.uk/news/what-happens-if-you-die-without-making-a-will.aspx</guid><pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 10:59:08 GMT</pubDate><content:encoded><![CDATA[ ]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Why get professional advice when making a Will?</title><link>http://www.eadsolicitors.co.uk/news/why-get-professional-advice-when-making-a-will.aspx</link><description>
There are certain legal formalities which must be observed when
making a Will in order for the document to be valid. So long as
these are observed then technically the Will is what is known as
'formally' valid. However, the requirements laid down by law are
strict. Furthermore, although a Will can be deemed to have formal
validity, there are situations where, had proper advice been taken;
a Will, which might otherwise have been upheld, has been
overturned.

The requirements for formal validity of a Will can be found in
section 9 of the Wills Act 1837. This includes the fact that it
must be made in writing and that the testator must sign the
document. The Act goes on to set out the requirements for the
witnessing of a Will and often this is where the formal validity of
homemade Wills is tested. The identity of the witnesses is also of
importance, as those who are beneficiaries under the Will, or the
spouse of a beneficiary, will invalidate their (or their spouse's)
inheritan</description><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eadsolicitors.co.uk/news/why-get-professional-advice-when-making-a-will.aspx</guid><pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 10:57:54 GMT</pubDate><content:encoded><![CDATA[ ]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Banks pay over £160m in compensation</title><link>http://www.eadsolicitors.co.uk/news/banks-pay-over-£160m-in-compensation.aspx</link><description>
2011 was a costly year for the UK's financial institutions, both
in terms of their bottom lines and their reputations.

Figures obtained by the Financial Times and a leading law firm
have found that Banks paid more than £160 million in compensation
to customers last year after a crackdown by financial
regulators.

Barclays was labelled the worst offender following the companies
damaging PPI compensation and payouts for the year were nearly
treble the £62 million in 2010. The bank was ordered to shell out
£59 million to retail customers and was fined £7.7 million for
failings in the way it sold funds labelled "cautious" and
"balanced".

HSBC was also trageted by the Financial Services Authority (FSA)
and landed with the largest ever retail fine of £10.5 million for
mis-selling investment bonds to elderly customers. And in at least
five separate cases, banks were ordered to pay at least £1 million
in compensation.

"We have had some significant retail fin</description><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eadsolicitors.co.uk/news/banks-pay-over-£160m-in-compensation.aspx</guid><pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 14:19:16 GMT</pubDate><content:encoded><![CDATA[ ]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Doctors sued for over prescribing Valium</title><link>http://www.eadsolicitors.co.uk/news/doctors-sued-for-over-prescribing-valium.aspx</link><description>
Doctors are being accused of creating 'Valium addicts' after
failing to follow safety guidelines on the prescription of the drug
published more than 20 years ago.

It has been reported by lawyers and medical experts that there
has been a significant increase in the number of clinical
negligence cases being brought against doctors in relation to
prescribing Valium.&amp;nbsp; Patients claim to have suffered physical
and psychological damage by the long-term use of addictive
tranquillisers such as Valium.

There have also been many cases where patients have sued doctors
due to the effect of being taken off the drug too quickly and have
argued that they should have been properly informed of the dangers
of rapid detoxification.&amp;nbsp; In the worst cases patients who are
suddenly taken off the drug can suffer seizures and even death.

Tranquillisers such as Valium are currently used by millions of
people worldwide and are often prescribed to deal with stressful
psycholog</description><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eadsolicitors.co.uk/news/doctors-sued-for-over-prescribing-valium.aspx</guid><pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 14:17:52 GMT</pubDate><content:encoded><![CDATA[ ]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Danger day for motorists passes</title><link>http://www.eadsolicitors.co.uk/news/danger-day-for-motorists-passes.aspx</link><description>
Were you involved in a road traffic accident on December 17, if
so you were one of thousands of motorists involved in the worst day
of the year for car crashes in the UK, Co-operative Insurance has
revealed.

Amazingly, for three consecutive years, the insurance company
has seen claims relating to car collisions and bumps increase by
129% on 17 December compared to a typical day of the year, leading
Co-operative to label the date 'Danger Day'.

More accidents occur in the week before Christmas than any other
week of the year, with claims relating to car crashes up by 94%
between 17 and 23 December, as shoppers and motorists flood the
roads to hunt for presents and visit their families.

According to Grant Mitchell, Head of Motor Insurance at The
Co-operative, the increase "is probably down to a combination of
the 'pre-Christmas rush' when everyone is dashing to the
supermarket or to buy last minute gifts, along with the fact that
people also feel tired and slu</description><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eadsolicitors.co.uk/news/danger-day-for-motorists-passes.aspx</guid><pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 12:14:10 GMT</pubDate><content:encoded><![CDATA[ ]]></content:encoded></item></channel></rss>
